Milestones
Performance Over Time
Latest 20 Solves
Click a dot to see scramble
Daily AO12
Daily AO100 & Mean
Smart Cube
Per-phase splits, TPS & reconstructions captured from a smart cube
Recent solves60
Where to Focus
Based on 59 smart-cube solves · vs your goal pace
You average 9.9s on F2L but need ~5.0s to hit your goal — about 4.9s to gain. Both lookahead and turn speed are slowing it down.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
F2L is 4.9s behind your goal pace — 4.9s of the 7.6s on the table across all four steps (64%).
- Lookahead pauses ~2.1s vs a ~0.5s goal-pace target (1.6s over).
- Turning ~7.2s vs ~4.5s (2.7s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 59 smart-cube solves.
You average 4.2s on OLL but need ~1.5s to hit your goal — about 2.6s to gain. Turn speed is the limiter, not alg recognition.
Why this? ▾Hide ▴
OLL is 2.6s behind your goal pace — 2.6s of the 7.6s on the table across all four steps (35%).
- Alg recognition pauses ~0.6s vs a ~0.4s goal-pace target (0.2s over).
- Turning ~3.6s vs ~1.1s (2.5s over).
Targets are your goal tier's pace for each step, from 59 smart-cube solves.
How each step compares to your goal pace
Your cross and first pair together average 4.1s versus ~2.2s for your goal. A slow cross-to-first-pair transition — tracking the first pair during your cross, or planning it in inspection, would close most of this.
This overlaps Cross and F2L above — read it on its own, not added to those bars.
Where Your Time Goes Over Time
Stacked solve time by phase — total height is your full solve; a shrinking stack means you're getting faster.
Each point is the median of up to 25 consecutive solves, dated by the block's last solve — not a daily average.
Monthly Stats
Includes historical & solve-based data
Growth Prediction
🎯 Chasing Sub-10
Recognition and execution are aligned within the expected range. Improvement here comes from technique refinement rather than raw speed development.
Sub-20 → Sub-15
→Sub-15 → Sub-10
1 tier🧭 Typical at this level
- • Strong F2L look-ahead
- • Low-rotation solving
- • Consistent Full PLL
- • Cross occasionally planned with +1
🎯 Recommended focus
- • Eliminate all visible pauses during F2L
- • Track the next pair before finishing the current insertion
- • Reduce rotation count
~50,730
solves remaining
≈ 259 sessions at your current pace
Sub-14s
~822
solves to next milestone
≈ 4 sessions
Your improvement rate is the biggest variable. A slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.
You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.
Forecast will stabilize with more sessions.
Based on solve data as of Jun 16, 2026
Performance Trend & Forecast
AI Performance Insight
Your AO100 of 15.35s shows you are in the Sub-15 transition, and your recent -1.58s gap indicates you are performing better than your average. However, your F2L is 3.78s over the target tier, which is the primary anchor on your times.
You must prioritize F2L lookahead and recognition to eliminate the +3.78s bottleneck. This is your largest time loss and is compounded by a +1.47s delay in your cross-to-first-pair transition.
Execute 50 slow-turn solves per day where you maintain a constant turning speed to force lookahead.
Combine this with 20 minutes of X-cross practice to reduce the +1.47s transition gap by planning the first pair during inspection.
Your 14-day improvement rate of -1.34 s/day is a strong indicator of growth. You have already achieved a 15.35s AO100, placing you within striking distance of the next tier.
The projection of 50730 solves to reach your target suggests that raw volume is not enough. Relying on your 2044 solves per week without specific technical drills will lead to a plateau.