Progress Dashboard

69 sessions tracked · 10546 solves · 3x3 Speed Solving

Current AO12

9.32s

Last 12 solves

Current AO100

8.81s

Last 100 solves

Best Single

4.85s

All-time best

Progress to Goal8.81s / 8.00s
95% to sub-8

Performance Over Time

Latest 20 Solves

Click a dot to see scramble

Daily AO12

Daily AO100 & Mean

Monthly Stats

Includes historical & solve-based data

MonthBest SinglePeak AO12Closing AO100
March 2026Latest5.83s7.97s8.81s
February 20265.10s7.85s8.98s
January 20264.85s7.78s8.58s
December 20256.07s7.61s9.17s

Growth Prediction

🎯 Chasing Sub-8

Stability Status
Efficiency Ceiling
gap -0.3sbench 0.641.2s14d -4.3ms/day

Consistency is strong, but improvement has stalled. Sub-optimal move efficiency or technique ceiling is likely limiting further AO100 drops.

Phase

Sub-10 → Sub-8

Plateau

🧭 Typical at this level

  • Consistent Full Cross+1 inspection
  • Efficient F2L (pseudo-slotting/keyhole)
  • Strong 1-look PLL recognition

🎯 Recommended focus

  • Improve Cross+1 success rate
  • Reduce move count in F2L
  • Eliminate micro-pauses through advanced look-ahead
Sub-8s goal

~40,175

solves remaining

263 sessions at your current pace

Why ~40,175 solves?
Gap to close8.8s → 8.0s = 0.8s
Improvement rate0.09ms / solve(60d, 5,803 solves)
Base estimate0.8s ÷ 0.09ms = 8,705
Difficulty scaling×4.622.5 wall included)
Estimate~40,175 solves

Your improvement rate is the biggest variable — a slower rate dramatically increases the estimate even when the gap is smaller.

You're entering advanced-level gains. Progress naturally slows.

high confidence

This estimate is based on stable long-term trends.

Based on solve data as of Mar 14, 2026

Performance Trend & Forecast

AI Performance Insight

Performance Interpretation

Current performance is 8.81 seconds, which is 0.33 seconds below the target time. A decreasing standard deviation, from a prior value to the current 1.027 seconds, indicates improved consistency. However, the 14-day slope of -0.004299 s/day and 30-day slope of -0.001969 s/day suggest a slowing rate of improvement, indicating a performance plateau.

Primary Focus

The 'efficiency_bottleneck' diagnosis, coupled with the plateau in improvement rate, suggests that further time reduction requires optimizing move efficiency rather than solely relying on faster recognition or execution. The gap between the session median of 9.14 seconds and the AO100 of 8.81 seconds indicates potential for improvement within existing solve characteristics.

Practice Strategy

Implement a block-building drill focusing on reducing move count in cross and F2L.

Practice slow, deliberate solves prioritizing optimal fingertricks and minimal rotations.

Record and analyze solves to identify redundant or inefficient movements, aiming for a reduction in total moves per solve.

Mindset

The current tier gap of 0 indicates alignment with the stated goal of achieving sub-8 second solves. Maintaining the current solve volume of 677 weekly solves is crucial for continued progress, though 40175 solves remain to reach a long-term target. Consistent effort focused on efficiency will yield further gains.

Risk

The 'structural_plateau' diagnosis suggests that continued practice without a change in approach may yield diminishing returns. Ignoring the efficiency bottleneck could limit the potential for further time reduction despite high solve volume.